On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:32:28PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >This simply isn't a good idea until 2.0. > > Does the project have a standard place to record proposed API changes for > the next major version so that they are not forgotten when that time comes? > If not, may I suggest putting this in the STATUS file under a heading like > "For version 2"?
I think that's a good idea, I've been collecting a diff against STATUS for APR stuff. There are probably already various API warts hidden away in doxygen comments in the headers which could be collected together too. joe
