On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:27:18PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > As explained in the other reply, it's not this code that causes the crash, > > but (maybe) the wrapper that calls it. The wrapper is autogenerated based > > on the prototype. I have no details of the crash, I hate talking on behalf > > of someone, when I don't know the details :( All I know is that 'access > > violation' is reported on win32. > > > > Anyway, all I'm now asking is to fix the prototype. Thank you. > > Gotcha. > > It's fine with me. I don't actually know how it would affect versioning > rules. It should be binary and source compatible... but then if it's > causing crashes one way and not causing them the other, maybe it's > actually *not* binary compatible? *big shrug*
Yes, I think C would require that the change would not break binary compatibility. But it does break source compatibility, there's no way around that. Let's not speculate about what is causing the crashes until that's really tracked down... joe
