Joe Orton wrote:

I'm still catching up from holiday stuff, but I presume you do mean just
apr-util not apr?  I think it would be preferable if any dependencies on
apr{,-util}-1.1 in httpd were conditional at compile-time (using
ap?_version.h), but there should be no barriers to release other than
round tuits, unless there are any regressions recently.

Cool.

If there is a hard dependency it should be enforced at configure-time
and that requires more AP?_FIND_AP? hacking I expect! (which would be
more work than just removing the dependency :)

Which in turn means the platform specific stuff that required the API change moves back into httpd, and suddenly we're back to #ifdef heaven.

I don't see any hassles about requiring that httpd depend on a certain minimum APR (it does already - httpd v2.1 depends minimally on APR v1.0) - the only issue is that there has been no official release of apr v1.1 yet for httpd to depend on.

Regards,
Graham
--

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature



Reply via email to