On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: > > Why? > > How to test something outside real-world anyhow. > > If Nick stands behind its patch, thats more then enough for me. > > Once we issue a release with that API, we can never change it in the 1.x > series. So, we *must* be conservative about deploying new APIs to ensure they > are perfect.
The DBD API may well want extending. I have some thoughts myself, but would like to see it in public SVN space before spending more time on it (FWIW, I'm *using* it for work-in-progress, and have not found it necessary to review the API in connection with that work:-) > FWIW, I would consider any features not buildable on Win32 as a showstopper > for 1.1.0, but that's my opinion. -- justin Indeedie. Is there some reason to suppose apr_dbd won't build on windows? Some of the drivers might not (does pgsql even exist on windows?), but I wouldn't see that as a showstopper, any more than a native MSSQL driver not compiling on *X. -- Nick Kew
