On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > If you two (and anyone else with an explicit vote on the apr-iconv > 1.0.2 tarball) vote in the next hour it would clarify things quite > a bit.
My original vote was intended to be +1 for release. Apparently such a vote at this point is of little value. And admittedly I haven't tested the thing. So I'll just call it a +0 for release. Which effectively means that the thing will be pulled, I realize. Like I said, I don't care. Let's just fix the problem and move on.
