Re: apr-iconv 1.0

[Curt Arnold]

I'm unclear on the proposed resolution.  Does it include a mechanism to 
distinguish apriconv-1 encoding modules from apriconv-0 modules either 
by changing the module signature or name? 	Without some mechanism to 
distinguish encoding modules, it really doesn't matter what order the 
paths are evaluated?  If there is a mechanism, it shouldn't hurt to 
evaluate APR_ICONV_PATH first?