At 01:02 PM 3/30/2005, Curt Arnold wrote: >If apr-iconv is an implementation detail of apr_xlate, then I don't see the >significance of deprecating it. Either it (or a replacement) is needed to >support apr_xlate on platforms that don't provide an iconv or apr_xlate needs >to be deprecated or removed.
We drop it. Point users 'elsewhere'. "Not Maintained Here" sign on the door. Tarball moves to archive.apache.org. Perhaps same for svn repository. Obviously we want apr_xlate to point at -something- but the what would no longer be apr_iconv. >I assume that Subversion is actually using apr_xlate or they would not have >bothered with setting APR_ICONV_PATH. Does httpd use apr_xlate? >If so, I don't see how you could deprecate apr_xlate or make it only available >on Unix platforms. Well, subversion does use apr_xlate. But this was actually reported by our log4cxx devs, who tripped over the subversion copy when they thought they were using their own build.
