[I'm answering specifically to apr@ - so that there isn't so much noise on so many lists :)]
At 12:19 PM 5/12/2005, you wrote: >On the specify compiler version used in builds, I think APR should >compile and pass tests on VC6, 7, 7.1 and 8. I've submitted patches >that also get it compiling and somewhat functioning on Borland C++ >5.6 and MinGW. I don't think that APR should dictate a specific >compiler that should be used by the people who bundle APR in their >application and APR doesn't appear to provide their own binary >distribution. +1, we are on the same page. I would be irritated by a product which installed a non-ASF, incompatible binary into /win/system32 for libapr.dll, but effectively you are right, however they like to build/distribute, apr libs in their local tree should simply work no matter which compiler. Even VC5 is fine to this purpose.
