On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:49 -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: > Okay, so then there really is a risk here for very large > repositories, particularly ones using FSFS.
It doesn't matter how large the repository is, only how large the commits to it are. > Should we start recommending that such projects upgrade to APR 1.X > (and httpd 2.1, if they're depending on mod_dav_svn?) Should we > write a FAQ about it? There's no particularly strong reason not to wait until you have a problem or are likely to have a problem before going to such lengths. > Funny, KDE is using fsfs, and I would have expected them to run into > a >2GB revision file. Why would a KDE developer commit more than 2GB of changes in one go?
