Thanks. Are you +1 for backporting to both apr-1.1 and apr-1.0? (I
put in a separate
vote in 1.0's STATUS file, since that branch has the same code for
creating the pollset.)
Can a couple of other committers please cast votes on this, too?
Thanks,
Brian
On Jul 15, 2005, at 11:13 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
++1 - obviously there are some heuristics to determine which
is the win - but you've identified a pretty clear case where
our preemptive strategy for creating a pollset was 'a bad idea' :)
+ *) Backport r209931 from 1.2 development trunk:
+ "Switch to lazy initialization of the pollset that's used
within
+ apr_file_t on platforms where apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout()
doesn't
+ use poll(2). (This fixes a performance problem observed in
httpd-2.x
+ on OS X due to the use of poll now being disabled by default
on that
+ platform.)"
+ +1: brianp
+ 0:
+ -1:
CURRENT test/testall -v EXCEPTIONS:
