Nick Kew wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Since apparently we require a release of APR-Util 1.2.0 to go along
with APR 1.2.0, and the only thing holding back APR-Util 1.2.0 is the
fact that the APR-DBD interfaces are going to change in the very near
future so that they can support Oracle,
Please see my post of Aug. 3rd. The likely changes will be fully
back-compatible, so there's no reason not to exclude apr_dbd as-is
from a new release.
Actually, I just replied to that, I'm not sure your proposed way forward
is in line with our versioning guidelines...
-garrett
