On 10/1/05, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/1/05, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Purify on Solaris pointed out that we were referencing uninitialized > > storage when checking revents. It was uninitialized (by kernel/libc) > > because no conditions were met. > > > > Concerns? > > The comment should be "caller should look at revents", not > "rtnevents".
Actually I meant the caller of apr_poll(). But that sort of guidance is better placed in the documentation (which I'll do). > Also, it seems like you could > compare against i, not *nsds, and avoid having to dereference a > pointer will-do Thanks for the comments!
