Yep, you are absolutely correct and I will have to look into getting this fixed for 1.3. I wasn't really thinking about running apr-0.9 and apr-1.x side-by-side mainly because this isn't a common practice on NetWare. Most of the time NetWare just has a single version of a library which is backwards compatible. And since realistically the only APR application running on NetWare is HTTPD, 99% of the NetWare users will probably just upgrade rather than try to run two different versions. However, this shouldn't be hard to fix and it would probably be a good idea to do so.
Brad >>> On 9/30/2005 at 9:56:22 pm, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just looking at http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/binaries/netware/ > (considering how to distribute win32 binaries, by coincidence). > > It seems that the netware distro of libapr.nlm is simply incorrect; as > it's not named libapr-1.nlm, it can't coexist with applications compiled > against apr-0.9. > > Obiously, fixing it breaks the rules, leaving it breaks the rules. > I was thinking that fixing it in 1.3.0 is probably the most painless > transistion. > > Comments from the netware platform peeps? > > Bill
