Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:01:07AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well... it's pretty clear iconv has no more eyes than three, and half
of those are not project members.
For what it's worth, I've put in the time to review and test each of the
proposals you posted, but saw little point in voting. Nevertheless; +1.
You can decide what weight to afford it ;) (non-PMC, committer-in-limbo,
so I suspect zero)
I better clarify - do you mean +1 to axe xlate/iconv, or did you mean
to +1 apr-util 1.1.1? As a new committer (even if the switches haven't
been thrown yet), certainly your vote makes a difference.
Bill
