One observation, one question w.r.t. the 0.9.x ./buildconf;
I noticed that someone tried to add the removal of autom4te from (apparently) xml/expat/ - but failed since the previous (cd xml/expat;) was in another scope. I'll patch 0.9.x and trunk (not expecting a bunch of things to happen in any other branch.) But my question is, why leave aclocal.m4 in expat/xml when the notes in the script observed that the root apr-util/aclocal.m4 could break some builds? Last small nit; we redirect other library builds to use the apr/libtool, why not also point xml/expat's build to do the same? Bill
