Joe Orton wrote:
So far as I understand how all this discussion is relevant to the
decision at hand ("what goes in apr-util") I agree with Ian.
I think that apr-util should continue to be an "everything plus the
kitchen sink" repository for APR-based code which:
a) the committers of this project think is generally useful, and
b) meets the expected standards of code quality, and
c) is relatively small in magnitude (i.e. I'd be worried about
dumping in tens of thousands of lines of new code)
+1.
Sander
