Thanks Garrett, that's 2.  Need a third before I roll a 2.1 beta binary of
httpd - any takers?

Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 11/11/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks.  Is that a vote +/-1 or +/-0 for 1.1.1?  Obviously it's worth addressing
the items you pointed out which were broken since 1.0.0.


If the problems have been there since 1.0.0, then consider this a +1,
since the release seems like a clear improvement over the previous
version.  We can always correct the remaining issues in the next
release.

-garrett

Reply via email to