On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:31 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > What's missing is the option to rollback even when successful. > In principle, a "rollback" argument to transaction_end would be > a better way to accomplish this. What level of version bump would > we need to introduce that?
Given that this would break binary compatibility, it would have to be done in 2.x. The "new function approach" could be done for 1.3. -- Bojan
