>>> On 7/12/2006 at 11:09 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/12/06, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The patch >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/include/apr_want.h?r1=151412&r2=421
> 075 >> which adds a hard coded definition of struct iovec causes redefinition >> problems at least on the NetWare platform and I would imagine others as >> well. The problem is that both the definitions of struct iovec found in >> sys/uio.h as well as the hard coded definition found in apr_want.h will >> be included under certain circumstances. > > What circumstance is that? > > The inclusion of the struct iovec def in apr_want.h is controlled by > the APR_HAVE_IOVEC feature check in autoconf. > > So, if it were dually included from both sys/uio.h and apr_want.h, > that means that the autoconf test is failing and that sys/uio.h > actually has the struct iovec definition and autoconf doesn't know > that. > > How does NW define the apr.h file? Perhaps it's just missing > #define'ing APR_HAVE_IOVEC to 1? That might be a more logical > explanation actually... -- justi Yes, you are correct. NetWare does not have autoconf and since the #define APR_HAVE_IOVEC was not added to the apr.hnw, it caused the compilation error. I will get the #define added. Brad
