Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 8/2/06, david reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Of course it does raise the question about where should these live? If >> we consider them to be "strings" function then they probably belong >> inside apr's strings funcs, but if they are "uri" functions then this is >> the correct place. Thoughts? > > If it's quoting based on the rules in the URL RFC, then apr_uri_ makes > the most sense. Now, the function you posted is called > apr_uri_query_string_decode, but I thought this was for general URI > encoding? Or, is this only for query strings? -- justin
That raises a productive suggestion; apr_uri_http_ for http-protocol specific parsing, apr_uri_ldap_ for ldap-protocol specific parsing etc ad nausem.
