On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:24 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > But given than RC4/RC5 are dead (RC4 needs to be killed ASAP with apr 2) > it seems we really should export and document them for general use with > apr 1.3
I see a whole bunch of functions named something like apr__SHA256_Data etc. AFAIK, this is not normally what APR names look like, so I'm guessing we should rename those to apr_sha256_data etc. and change references in existing code to new names. These are public symbols, however, so I don't know if changing them would break API compatibility (given that they are not used outside APR). The private sha2.h should then become apr_sha2.h in the include directory, I guess. -- Bojan
