On 3/20/07, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, why do you undefine the generics atomics defines? they exist for a reason!
On 3/20/07, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, why do you undefine the generics atomics defines? they exist for a reason!
#if defined(SOLARIS2) && ((SOLARIS2 + 0) >= 10) #include <atomic.h> #if defined(USE_GENERIC_ATOMICS) #undef USE_GENERIC_ATOMICS #endif If i am in Solaris >= 10 and i have the Solaris atomics, do i want to still need the generic atomics ?
Your patch also seems to be a diff against a httpd source tree, and includes httpd-specific code. This is [EMAIL PROTECTED], please use it only for APR code, and it's best to submit patches against trunk , *not* whatever httpd happens to ship :-)
yes it is against 2.2.4. when i sent the original patch for the atomics to httpd@, a couple months ago, i was told to send it to apr@, because "this was an apr patch". ;-) --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
