Issac Goldstand wrote: > Any chance someone can review the patch at > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42526 for considered > inclusion in the next set of tarballs?
If it treats endianness correctly by cpu, I'm all for it. However, if http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20277 simply maps both to the default endianness, this patch is silly ;-) Without my spending 30 minutes in there, can you describe how -BE and -LE mappings produce the CORRECT unicode word encodings independent of the platform's default? Bill
