On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 13:24, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for that? > >> Seriously, folks. > > > > What is the better criteria? > > * offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor > > * actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and may > be > > a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR hacking, > > though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certain) > > If it is still being used, then... well, geez. *shudder* > > And in response to your question, "duh. not like I have any super-vote > here. just opening a discussion." Here's a better opening to such a discussion ;) "Hey guys, here are some platforms/nuances/whatever currently in APR that I think we might be able to drop in 2.0. Which are still being used/maintained?" ;)
