RE: APR: Portable across Operating Systems, or Libraries?

[Flowering Weeds]

> > When thinking about 2.0, I'm having a hard time with the idea of> pulling 
> > apr-util into regular apr. We've got a lot of stuff in> apr-util that has 
> > nothing to do with "Portability". Basically, I see> apr-util doing one of 
> > two types of things:> > * common API to access functionality (dbd, ldap, 
> > crypto)
 
All do know that crypto in Windows is .NET only from now on? 
 
http://blogs.msdn.com/karinm/archive/2009/01/19/capicom-dll-removed-from-windows-sdk-for-windows-7.aspx
So will APR crypto be .NET aware from now on too?
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_012009