On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Mladen Turk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>>
>> There have been various discussions on list in the past about the
>> problems with pools, and that newer malloc implementations really are
>> better at it han we can ever be. (jemalloc for example
>> <http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/jemalloc/bsdcan2006/jemalloc.pdf>).
>>
>> Patch:
>> <http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/marvelous-malloc.patch>
>>
>> - palloc now used malloc underneath.
>> - we keep a list of malloc'ed adrresses, in a new list object, and
>> free them on clear/destroy
>> - unmanaged/core pool APIs removed.
>>
>> I'd like to just put this into APR-2 trunk asap, and then figure out
>> how to unify the pool debug code with these changes.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> Why did you remove the unmanaged pool?

because when we are using malloc/free, they shouldn't be needed?

Reply via email to