Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 10:49 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:03 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: >>> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:26 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: >>>> Before we even contemplate having this in 1.3.x >>> And if you want to play with it in 1.3.x, here is the patch. It should >>> save you some conflict resolution. >> Just wanted to gather opinions from the list on this once again. We are >> talking about CLOEXEC patch for 1.3.x. >> >> I would like to see if there are any -1 votes for this, so that we can >> put the proposal to rest for this particular branch. > > Ping...
I don't have an objection, it seems you thought this out, but I don't always seem to have a buy in over what is "compatibility" - you might want the opinion of one or more port maintainers ;)
