Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'm concerned about the Windows build glitch noted by Gregg Smith.
How big an issue is that?

No. It seems testlib project links to the static(?) library apr*-1.lib whereas testdll project links to the shared(?) library libapr*-1 and network_io/unix/socket_util.c was not included in the apr project like it is in the libapr project.

Same results for testlib as testdll per my first email so my non-binding vote is still +1

--- apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/apr.dsp      821199
+++ apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/apr.dsp      Working
@@ -396,6 +396,10 @@
 # End Source File
 # Begin Source File

+SOURCE=.\network_io\unix\socket_util.c
+# End Source File
+# Begin Source File
+
 SOURCE=.\network_io\win32\sockopt.c
 # End Source File
 # End Group



Reply via email to