On 01/20/2010 08:28 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > We have really trimmed down the footprint of apr as a loadable library, > so the very last not-dynamic component is expat. > > It's small and lightweight, and I just wanted to confirm that the devs > are all comfortable that xml is pervasive enough to merit binding expat > with libdl every time a user launches an apr-based application. > > I'm about to revisit adding ICU support in place of our apriconv, and that > would certainly be abstracted. Expat certainly could be abstracted, but > I'm not sure if we see there is a value in doing so?
expat and iconv would be optional, no? Cheers Jean-Frederic
