Hi all, Jeff Trawick schrieb: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Guenter Knauf <fua...@apache.org> wrote: >> BTW. while I was on that found that in httpd's roll.sh the gpg signing >> part looks wrong to me - therefore I kept the way how the signing user >> is handled same as was before in apr's release.h; but I believe it >> should be fixed for httpd's roll.sh: > > I can't comment on the exact patch, but I had issues with this section > of httpd's roll.sh signing the mod_fcgid release currently in test and > had to comment out the setting of args. I have tested this signing section a bit more with gpg (the part which differs and looks wrong) and think it can be simplified like this: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testsigning/testsigning.sh.txt
please everyone who has some mins test this test script with/without username argument, f.e.: ./testsigning.sh httpd-2.2.14 and: ./testsigning.sh httpd-2.2.14 yourname and then report back if it works or not, and which tool and version you used (gpg or pgp - I bindly assumed in the script that pgp also knows of --version) thanks, Gün.
