On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/6/2010 7:47 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> See http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution >> files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one >> generated by release.sh is not used?). > > Correct, it's used verbatim, with the addition of .mak files which had > changed early and often in 0.9. > > Now that stable releases rarely change source files, my thought is to > check in win32 command line build files on the .0 tag, and leave them > in the released branch (touching them only when necessary). This might > make special 'windows handling' obsolete.
makes sense (I'd add another step 0 to tag&roll: "make sure it still builds on Windows")
