On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/11/2010 6:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Bojan Smojver <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 20:47 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>>> [+1] Release apr-1.3.12 >> >> That's the third binding vote. Barring any other odd reports in the >> next 6 or so hours, I'll update the release directory around then. > > Whoops +1 here; will add win32 source and binaries done this afternoon.
Thanks > Can I suggest we send out the 1.4.2 email with the security notice, and > in _that_ announcement refer to the availability of 1.3.12 for those who do > not wish to introduce new functionality? Of course the directory should have > both Does 1.4.2 really need a security notice? (I didn't see anything applicable.) Otherwise, "sure." Do we try to address probable developer expectations that they'd move to APR 1.new.x and APR-Util 1.new.x at the same time? Let's see now... apr release directory: create Announcement1.4.* (Announcement1.3.* already refers to it as a bug fix release and encourages adoption of unnamed "latest APR 1.x") HEADER.html: APR 1.4.2 is the latest available version/APR 1.3.12 is also available README.html: ditto apr site: download.* and index.* I should be free to help in a few hours.
