On Mar 16, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> 
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> 
>>> In trying to get Subversion acquainted with the 1.4.x branch, I
>>> encountered the a crash within an invocation of apr_psprintf().  The
>>> attached patch adds a test case demonstrating the crash.  The patch is
>>> against 1.4.x, but applies to trunk as well, where the bug is also
>>> present.
>>> 
>>> The test case is essentially a replication of one of the calls to
>>> apr_psprintf() that happens deep within Subversion, and which
>>> functions just fine when working against 1.3.x.  In digging a little
>>> deeper, it appears that the var arg pointer isn't being advanced
>>> properly at some point in apr_vformatter(), but I'm hoping that
>>> someone more familiar with the code will be able to figure out what's
>>> really going on.
>> 
>> Digging deeper, it appears to be an error in apr_vformatter() when parsing 
>> the format '%lld'.  I'm running the tests on Mac OS X where APR_OFF_FMT_T is 
>> defined as lld, so this format occurs frequently.  Consequently, I'm also 
>> seeing a failure in testfmt at line 63, where the parser is attempting to 
>> parse APR_OFF_FMT_T, but failing.  Can anybody else replicate this bug?
>> 
>> I'm a little new here, but would consider something like this is probably a 
>> blocker for 1.4.x.  This may already have been discussed, but I haven't seen 
>> it, at least in the past couple of months.
>> 
> 
> Are you forcing -arch i386 ?
> 
> It may be you are hitting the problem with APR and universal binaries under
> OS X. With Snow Leopard, this no longer works correctly, and
> trying to compile both as i386 and x86-64 results in problems because
> the actual C header files are different depending on which version is
> built. A patch was put in awhile ago to fix this, but was vetoed.

I'm using whatever './configure' spits out on Snow Leopard.  I don't see an 
explicit '-arch' flag in the compiler flags

-Hyrum

Reply via email to