All, I see the following bug. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45291 The bug has proposed updates\fix in apr thread.c file. Is the fix safe and correct to try?
Thanks and Regards, Prathima. -----Original Message----- From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] On Behalf Of Bert Huijben Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 8:31 AM To: 'Erik Huelsmann'; 'William A. Rowe Jr.' Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: RE: Thread handle leak in APR > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehu...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 13:20 > To: William A. Rowe Jr. > Cc: dev@apr.apache.org > Subject: Re: Thread handle leak in APR > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On 8/20/2010 1:08 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > >> Hi Prathima, > >> Am 20.08.2010 09:04, schrieb Prathima Dandapani -X (pdandapa - HCL > >> at > >> Cisco): > >>> Steps used to compile Apache is as follows. > >>> Run Setenv.cmd from the Windows-Server-2003-R2-Platform-SDK > installed > >>> directory > >>> Run vcvars32.bat from VC++ installed directory. > >> AFAICT this is the wrong order; first you need to call > >> vcvars32.bat, then Setenv.cmd so that the PSDK paths are prepended. > > > > Precisely :) > > Will reversing the order make his leak disappear? Changing the order might give you older or newer .lib and .h files depending on the exact VS and SDK versions, so it might add or hide some functions that are otherwise unavailable. But it should never change the behavior. Bert
