On Thursday 17 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Please also look at Greg's pocore memory allocation stuff... > his hash stuff is also quite nice. Would be useful to be > able to use that as well....
That looks like a much bigger change than what I have just commited. But I agree that before trying to optimize apr's allocator, one should try pocore's. Have you thought about how to do this? Probably every apr pool would be a wrapper for a pocore pool. But what about the other users of apr_allocator, like bucket allocators?
