On 29 Jun 2011, at 2:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Note that I removed the unsed variable to prevent a compiler warning.
The code in 1.4.x and 1.5.x is different: it passes the pool along to
crypto_shutdown() which then doesn't use it. I guess we want the
code to
be consistent, but I'm not sure, which way to prefer - pass the pool
to crypto_shutdown and ignore there (1.4, 1.5), or already dropp it in
crypto_shutdown_helper (trunk).
apr-trunk, v1.5.x and v1.4.x should all be the same, and if they're
not it's an oversight.
Regards,
Graham
--
