On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 16:39 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Question; do we want each hash to have a unique randomization factor?
That would probably be more secure. As is, seed would be initialised just once per process. The apr_hashfunc_t function prototype would then most likely have to change. We'd probably need to pass the hash itself into it, which would then hold the per-hash seed. Right? -- Bojan
