On 06.01.2012 00:05, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 09:48 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: >> The apr_hashfunc_t function prototype would then most likely have to >> change. We'd probably need to pass the hash itself into it, which >> would then hold the per-hash seed. Right? > Actually, that would not be a good plan. A custom hash function would > not be able to see inside the hash structure, because it's opaque. Most > likely, the seed itself would have to be passed around as the third > argument. Any other ideas?
- hash = ht->hash_func(key, &klen); + hash = randomize_hash(ht, ht->hash_func(key, &klen); Completely private change that leaves hash_func_t unchanged. -- Brane
