On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 4/9/2012 11:04 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Monday 09 April 2012, Rainer Jung wrote: >>>> Do you disagree with the procedure and/or my attempt to describe >>>> the "normal" way this is handled? >>> >>> No, I agree and I think it is more useful to include the CHANGES >>> entry in the backport commit than to split it in a second commit. >>> At least that's what I tried to do in the past influenced by >>> following the list and commit messages. Sometimes the CHANGES >>> entry either is forgotten during the backport commit or postponed >>> by a differing personal preference and is then added soon as a >>> separate commit which I think is less useful but still acceptable. >> >> +1 > > +1; and ++1 for formalizing this at apr.a.o/dev/
I'll do that. (No, really!)
