On Monday 25 March 2013, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > As a first step, I noticed that apr_itoa, apr_ltoa, apr_off_t_toa > could be tweaked to require less memory for some common cases. > The attached patch reduces memory use for small values, that is to > say for strings that fit in 8 bytes (including NULL)
Looks like a reasonable optimization to me. Cheers, Stefan