On Monday 25 March 2013, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> As a first step, I noticed that apr_itoa, apr_ltoa, apr_off_t_toa
> could  be tweaked to require less memory for some common cases.
> The attached patch reduces memory use for small values, that is to
> say  for strings that fit in 8 bytes (including NULL)

Looks like a reasonable optimization to me.

Cheers,
Stefan

Reply via email to