On Thursday 15 May 2014 10:03:25, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > + if (old == 2 && pool->in_use_by == apr_os_thread_current()) {
>
> How can old ever be 2?That was a leftover from a version with a separate state for the pool being cleared. > > > + /* cleanups may use the pool */ > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (old != 0) > > + pool_concurrency_abort(pool, __func__, old); > > Isn't __func__ C99? Thanks for the review. Both issues fixed in r1595549. Stefan
