On 2/1/2017 09:58, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 02:23, Stefan <luke1...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> [...]
>
>> The case is reproducible with the following code inside a DLL and
>> executing that from a calling process (a complete repro project is
>> available on my issue tracker [1]):
> You have to wait callbacks to finish if thread pool callback resides
> in DLL, because it could be unloaded before APR will destroy
> threadpool.
>
>
I'm having difficulties following you here. Note that all threads
already terminated (the idle threads processed in trim_idle_threads got
terminated without cleanly exiting the thread_pool_func() function and
therefore did not decrement the thread-counter). Am I missing something?

Regards,
Stefan


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to