On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I'm not a big fan of the "sleep" fallback implementation. >> > > Feel free to replace it with something better.
Would an implementation based on a pipe (hence two FDs per mutex) be acceptable?
