On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I'm not a big fan of the "sleep" fallback implementation. >> > > Feel free to replace it with something better.
Would an implementation based on a pipe (hence two FDs per mutex) be acceptable?
