I still monitor the list, I just don’t post. If I remember correctly, this code came from httpd 1.3. I might have made some small changes, but I am pretty sure this code’s lineage could be traced all the way back to when it was BSD licensed. I say go ahead for my part.
Ryan On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:36 AM Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 11:30 -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > then all further patches to apr_fnmatch.c would still be licensed in > > BSD terms and consumable upstream, provided the PMC is agreeable; > > > > 5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with > > on a case-by-case basis by the PMC. > > > > This would make the synchronization of POSIX [:class:] and other bug > > fixes and extensions to apr_fnmatch much simpler. > > > > Would this be acceptable to APR PMC? > > As far as I'm concerned, that's fine provided we have no objections > from any significant contributors. A quick look at svn suggests > that's basically yourself, with some early commits from Ryan. > I don't think Ryan is active here any more, so perhaps he should > be pinged as a matter of courtesy? > > Or is his name there a mere technicality, perhaps a legacy > of an initial code drop into svn? > > -- > Nick Kew > > -- Ryan Bloom rbl...@gmail.com
