On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 8:18 PM Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2026 at 18:37, Timofei Zhakov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think this syntax is much simpler, more convenient, and looks >> prettier. According to the documentation [1] cmake will do its best at >> avoiding copying the file twice if the same exists with matching >> timestamps. Not using cmake executable to copy files will also slightly >> improve configuration time because it removes invoking extra tools, if it's >> even remotely close to being anywhere significant. >> >> Committed in r1934148. > > Thanks! > Thank you! -- Timofei Zhakov
