Thanks for the link, I had forgotten. Did that get turned into a development process doc somewhere, so we can stop having this discussion? :)
Okay, then let's get the "new" 1.1 out there soon. (Can we re-name the first 1.1 tag to 1.1-r12345 or something to remind us that there were two of them?) -- Wendy On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to follow > that style, not the httpd one. [1] > > Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we ended > up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to reconsider in > light of that, and the issue with the release? > > I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing I'm not > in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the current 1.1 build > since it would cause too much confusion. > > Cheers, > Brett > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
