Hello Linus I will add comments to your reply:
On 9/6/06, Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Bogdan! Some small comments only... [...] > I think that the architecture of ArgoEclipse completely right, we > should have these projects: > > - argoeclipse-argouml : [...] > - argoeclipse-core : [...] [...] Exactly what do you mean by "projects" here? Do you mean packages or jar files or what?
These are not Tigris projects, but plugin projects inside Eclipse, these constitute the building blocks of ArgoEclipse (project on Tigris). I think that we should break the current implementation (right now we use two plugins, one for ArgoUML wrapped and one for other stuff added by ArgoEclipse). More clearly: We refer to ArgoEclipse as being a Eclipse plugin, actually this is a group of plugins.
> The packages org.argouml.argoeclipse.core.* do you think it's OK to be > shorter like org.argoeclipse.*? > I'm not sure about this. You can use org.argoeclipse if you register the domain argoeclipse.org. I suggest you do not. If you want it shorter, let me suggest org.argouml.eclipse.core.*, or perhaps org.eclipse.argouml.core.* (if you can get the eclipse guys to accept it). If you are thinking of eventually extending ArgoEclipse to other Argo tools ;-) you could use org.eclipse.argo.core.*
I just found out that argouml.org and argouml.com are registered by Jason Robbins and are redirected to argouml.tigris.org, :) . Previously I thought that you used org.argouml.* without registering anything (because the address of the project was on tigris). Thanks for the tips. It's OK to use org.argouml.argoeclipse.*, I understand now the implications: ArgoEclipse being based on ArgoUML. Bogdan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
