Hello Farrikh!

Exactly what are the differences between MOF/MDR and ebXML/freebXML?

Not looking at this from a technical perspective the big difference is
probably the supporters of the different techniques.

MOF is put forward as a standard by OMG, ebXML by some e-business
interest group.

Sofar ArgoUML (and UML) has been all OMG and with the software
developers' arrogance we are looking on things the business people drag
in with skepticism.

On the other hand, the two worlds are merging. Looking at
http://www.bpmi.org/ it looks like the BPMI and OMG have worked together
for over a year so I am not all updated.

A couple of years back (I think it was in 2002) Anders W. Tell was
discussing something similar on this list. Since he is located in
Stockholm I met with him over lunch and discussed the use of ArgoUML in
his work. We lost contact. His website about ebxml
(http://www.ebxml.nu/) doesn't seem really updated anymore (not much has
happened there since 2004) and the project Open ebXML seems abandoned.

        /Linus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh S. Najmi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 1 september 2006 21:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [argouml-dev] Collaborative authoring in ArgoUML?
> 
> 
> Dear ArgoUML developers,
> 
> I am a newbie to ArgoUML and I really like what you have created.
> 
> Please forgive me if this email seems a bit out-of-the-blue...
> 
> I have started using ArgoUML to design the next generation version of
an
> the freebXML Registry open source project:
> 
>
<http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Overview#What_is_freebXML
_R
> egistry>
> 
> As I was doing the UML design I looked in the FAQ to see if any
> collaborative authoring features so I could use it with the rest of my
> open source dev team:
> 
> <http://argouml.tigris.org/faqs/users.html#bunch_link>
> 
> Looking at the answer it occurred to me that perhaps ArgoUML could use
> the freebXML Registry as a backend store to manage UML models as
> metadata and be able to build collaborative authoring features using
the
> features provide by the freebXML Registry project. Here is a scenario
I
> had done for a similar idea:
> 
>
<http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Overview#Collaborative_Au
th
> oring:_An_Illustrative_Use_Case>
> 
> I am actually much more excited about the possibility of an ArguUML +
> freebXML Registry potential because I think that ArgoUML also has the
> potential for solving some needs in the freebXML Registry project. We
> need a UML editor that can be used to define vocabulary building block
> called "ebXML Core Components" using the UMM Profile of UML and then
> manage those components within the registry.
> 
> Does any of this sound interesting to any of you? Is there interest in
> collaboratively exploring a symbiotic mutual dependency between
ArgoUML
> and freebXML Registry?
> 
> PS: We just did a major release of freebXML Registry. Announcement may
> be found here:
> <http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=606669>
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to