Great! I will update the plan with this.
When first planned the 0.24 release I hoped that ArgoEclipse would be
synchronizing the releases by now. I have fixed that too.
/Linus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 8 januari 2007 21:19
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Plan for the 0.24 release
>
> > Does this mean that the split-model repository is not
> > included in 0.24? I suppose so.
>
> I haven't seen any checkins related to this, so I think that's a safe
> assumption. Most of the issues related to this work are assigned to
me,
> but
> I'm pretty sure that I never committed to completing the work for this
> release. If someone can point me to where I gave this misimpression,
I'll
> work on clarifying the communications in the future.
>
> I presume the date for 0.24.beta2 is meant to be 2007-02-04, not
2007-01-
> 04.
>
> I don't understand the ArgoEclipse reference. ArgoEclipse is a
separate
> project on an independent release cycle.
>
> Since this is principally a bug fix release, a month should be fine to
get
> things stabilized and out the door (as long as we stay focused).
>
> Tom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linus Tolke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 5:19 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [argouml-dev] Plan for the 0.24 release
> >
> > Great!
> >
> > For the 10th of February I have now set a suggested plan for
> > the alpha and beta period. According to the plan the first
> > alpha will be made on Wednesday.
> >
> > Does this mean that the split-model repository is not
> > included in 0.24? I suppose so.
> >
> > Please comment on the suggested plan!
> >
> > /Linus
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: den 5 januari 2007 00:19
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] The release 0.23.5
> > >
> > > > You can now commit in trunk towards the next release. If the
next
> > > release is
> > > > denoted 0.23.6 or 0.24.alpha1 is still not decided. I
> > will denote it
> > as
> > > > 0.23.6 for the time being.
> > >
> > > Is there some reason to delay the date of the 0.24 release?
> > Surely we
> > > should be making weekly alphas and then betas to make 10th Feb.
> > >
> > > Bob.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
