I'll consider this a design decision and document it in the Cookbook.
/Linus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 14 februari 2007 01:02
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Wellformedness rules again
>
> aHi Linus
>
> I'm not aware of any well-formedness rules in UML1.4.2 that are for
> anything other than for model elements.
>
> As I've mentioned earlier I don't think we should enforce all
> well-formedness rules and each is up for discussion. Where we do
> currently enforce I think it it is the responsibility of the model
> subsystem to do so. That keeps the code centralised in our existing
> architecture.
>
> Regards
>
> Bob.
>
>
>
> On 13/02/07, Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Bob!
> >
> > Bob Tarling wrote in a commit comment:
> > > Check wellformedness rule 4.5.3.20 [5] in a centralised place.
> >
> > Does this means that it is the Model subsystem responsibility to
contain
> > tests for all wellformedness rules? Or just the wellformedness rules
> > that does contain only model elements?
> >
> > /Linus
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
